The Laken Riley Act: A look at the first bill Trump will sign
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump is poised to sign the first bill of his new istration, and it is named after a slain Georgia nursing student whose name became a rallying cry during his White House campaign.
If signed into law, the Laken Riley Act would require the detention of unauthorized immigrants accused of theft and violent crimes. The bill won bipartisan in both the House and Senate.
Here are some things to know about the Laken Riley Act:
Who was Laken Riley?
Riley, 22, was a student at Augusta University College of Nursing when she went out for a run on Feb. 22, 2024, on the University of Georgia campus in Athens. Prosecutors said she was encountered by Jose Antonio Ibarra, who killed her during a struggle. Ibarra waived his right to a jury trial and was found guilty in November of murder and other crimes by a judge, who alone heard and decided the case. He was sentenced to life without parole.
MORE FROM NEWS 12
Laken Riley: AU student’s murder shocked the nation
- UGA students see safety enhancements after Laken Riley slaying
- Details revealed on Laken Riley killing
- Laken Riley murder suspect had prior criminal background
- AU student’s slaying sends shockwaves from Athens to Augusta
Trump and other Republicans blamed former President Joe Biden for her death because Ibarra had been arrested for illegal entry in September 2022 near El Paso, Texas, amid an unprecedented surge in migration and released to pursue his case in immigration court.
“If this act had been the law of the land, he never would have had the opportunity to kill her,” said Rep. Mike Collins, a Georgia Republican.
Biden mentioned Riley during his State of the Union address last year as he spoke about border security and after U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene shouted at him, “Say her name!”
What does the bill do?
Under the new law, federal officials would be required to detain any migrant arrested or charged with crimes like shoplifting or assaulting a police officer or crimes that injure or kill someone.
“If you come into this country illegally and you commit a crime, you should not be free to roam the streets of this nation,” said Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., who helped push the bill through the Senate.
The bill also empowers state attorneys general to sue the federal government for harm caused by failures or decisions in immigration enforcement that harm states or people. That includes releasing migrants from custody or failing to detain migrants who have received deportation orders.
The provision gives states some power in setting immigration policy when they have been trying to push back against presidential decisions under both the Trump and Biden istrations.
While Republicans control both chambers of Congress, 46 Democrats in the House and 12 Democrats in the Senate ed the measure.
Why did most Democrats oppose it?
Some have raised concerns that the bill would strip due process rights for migrants, including minors or recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
“In the wake of tragedy we are seeing a fundamental erosion of our civil rights,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, a New York Democrat. “In this bill, if a person is so much as accused of a crime, if someone wants to point a finger and accuse someone of shoplifting, they would be rounded up and put into a private detention camp and sent out for deportation without a day in court.”
Trump proposes ‘getting rid of FEMA’ while visiting hurricane damage in North Carolina
President Donald Trump said he was considering “getting rid of FEMA” as he visited hurricane-battered North Carolina on Friday during the first trip of his second term.
Most Democrats criticized the lack of funding in the bill, arguing the new law would not solve immigration problems but would impose new requirements on federal authorities. Democrats on the Appropriations Committee estimate the bill would cost $83 billion over the next three years, according to a memo obtained by The Associated Press.
Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said the bill is “a totally unfunded mandate.”
Why did some Democrats back it?
Democrats who ed it were mostly from five battleground states and said their constituents demanded more border security and ed deportations of migrants accused of crimes.
“Anyone who commits a crime should be held able. That’s why I voted to the Laken Riley Act,” Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., said on social media after its age.
New Hampshire Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner also ed the bill. Shaheen and Warner are each up for a fourth term next year.
Oath Keepers founder is barred from entering Washington or Capitol
A federal judge on Friday barred Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes from entering Washington, D.C.
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who also backed the bill because he wants a “secure border,” was the first Senate Democrat to meet with Trump after the election. He has met with many of Trump’s Cabinet picks and broken with his own party on some policy.
Sen. Ruben Gallego, whose parents are immigrants from Mexico and Colombia, was just elected in November and became Arizona’s first Latino senator. He said he ed the bill.
“We must give law enforcement the means to take action when illegal immigrants break the law, to prevent situations like what occurred to Laken Riley,” he said in a statement.
Copyright 2025 WRDW/WAGT. All rights reserved.
